Release Gate Status
Automated release policy gate assessing silent failures, tool verification, and safe degradation.
Automated Release Gate Policy Rules
0 runs evaluated| Status | Rule Name | Threshold | Observed Value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run an experiment to populate release gate checklist. | ||||
Chaos Experiment Scenario Matrix
Scenarios mapped to Agentic Chaos fault primitives testing resilience boundaries.
| Scenario ID | Fault Type | Targeted Step / Component | Hypothesis | Unsafe Outcomes |
|---|
Test Runs
0AgenticLens Span Waterfall
Version Comparison: v1 (Naive) vs v2 (Hardened)
Quantifying reliability gains against operational overhead (tokens, cost, latency).
Reliability & Overhead Delta Table
| Dimension | v1 (Naive) | v2 (Hardened) | Delta / Impact |
|---|
Disparate Resilience by Synthetic Segment
Verifying that fault resilience and silent-failure rates do not disproportionately affect specific applicant groups.
| Synthetic Group | Total Applications | Silent Failure Rate | Safe Degradation Rate | Escalation Rate |
|---|
Decision & Adverse-Action Audit
Inspect individual applicant decisions, verify deterministic oracle ground truth vs model determinations, and validate adverse notice grounds.
No document selected
Multi-Agent Workflow Topology
Interactive topology showing agent handoffs, tool invocation edges, and injected chaos fault points.
Resource, Cost & Latency Profiling
Measured via AgenticLens profiler per agent span: token volume, API pricing, and latency SLAs.
Token Usage By Agent Span
| Agent Name | Agent Role | Type | Tokens | Avg Latency | Cost Contribution |
|---|
Interactive Scenario Launcher
Select chaos scenarios, tune fault injection parameters, and execute the reliability test harness.
Audit-Ready Evidence Packages
Reports generated per release mapped to DORA scenario testing and AI Act human-oversight principles.